In discussing the characteristics of a character, what does 'perfect' signify in literary criticism?

In literary criticism, when the term 'perfect' is used to describe a character, it typically signifies a portrayal that meets all idealized standards. This means that the character embodies qualities that society or the narrative considers admirable or desirable, often being portrayed as flawless or exhibiting traits that are seen as morally superior. Such characters provide a clear example of an ideal, allowing readers to understand certain virtues or values as they are exemplified through their actions and decisions.

This portrayal can serve various functions within a narrative, including presenting a stark contrast to flawed characters, thus highlighting the complexities of human nature and ethical decisions. Characters that fit this 'perfect' mold often serve as role models or aspirational figures, guiding other characters or the audience towards particular ideals.

Other characterizations, such as those that emphasize flaws, moral dilemmas, or complexity, focus on different aspects of character development. While these are valuable in portraying the struggles and growth of characters, they do not align with the notion of 'perfect' in the context of literary analysis.