What do you call an inference that does not logically follow from the premises?

The term "Non Sequitur" specifically refers to a conclusion or inference that does not logically follow from the premises provided. In logic and reasoning, a non sequitur creates a disconnect between the evidence and the conclusion drawn, indicating that the reasoning is flawed. This is essential in understanding the validity of arguments, as an argument built on a non sequitur lacks coherence and can lead to misunderstandings.

In contrast, a "Fallacy" broadly encompasses any erroneous reasoning or argumentation pattern, which may include non sequiturs but also covers a wide range of logical errors. "Premise" refers to a statement or proposition upon which an argument is built, while "Conclusion" is the final inference or judgment derived from the premises. However, neither of these concepts directly addresses the specific situation where the inference lacks logical connection to the premises. Thus, the correctness of identifying a non sequitur as an inference that does not logically follow is well-founded in logical analysis.